Application for promotion from 1st October 2016 to a Professorship

FACULTY PROMOTIONS COMMITTEE EVALUATION

THIS DOCUMENT IS DISCLOSABLE UNDER THE FEEDBACK ARRANGEMENTS.

Applicant : ________________________________  Faculty/Department : _________________

Terms of Evaluation
Applications should be evaluated in relation to the criteria for each of the senior academic offices for which the applicant is eligible for consideration (Section 5). 

Performance descriptors (bandings):  The appropriate boxes should be ticked to record the relevant Committee’s decisions.  Faculty Promotion Committees should provide comment in relation to each criterion for the office for which the candidate has applied, taken from the Minutes of the meeting.  

Research/Scholarship Criterion

There must be established international leadership in the relevant subject with reference to:
•	originality
•	contribution to the advancement of knowledge 
•	reputation

Tick box						Comment

□

□

□

□

□

Outstanding 
evidence            

Strong 
evidence            

Clear 
evidence           

Insufficient 
evidence           

Clearly 
unsatisfactory   	

	

FACULTY PROMOTIONS COMMITTEE EVALUATION

Teaching Criterion*

There must be an effective contribution to undergraduate and/or postgraduate teaching. 

*This criterion does not apply to those whose duties do not include teaching.

				Comment

□

□

□

□

□

Outstanding 
evidence            

Strong 
evidence            

Clear 
evidence           

Insufficient 
evidence           

Clearly 
unsatisfactory   	

	

General Contribution Criterion

There must be an effective contribution to the subject other than in teaching and research.  This may include administration and, where appropriate, management of research groups and the creation and management of multi- institutional/national/international research facilities.  It may also include contributions to the subject made more widely, for example, widening participation activity and the design and delivery of outreach programmes; and also editorial work, and clinical work (if applicable). 
							Comment

□

□

□

□

□

Outstanding 
evidence            

Strong 
evidence            

Clear 
evidence           

Insufficient 
evidence           

Clearly 
unsatisfactory   	

	

Signed:________________________________________   Date: _______________
Chair of Faculty Promotions Committee

This document may be provided to candidates after completion of the relevant annual exercise, as written feedback on their application.

Additionally, the relevant Head of Institution will ensure all unsuccessful candidates are offered feedback in person.